(The Center Square) — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a case over whether a federal prisoner can petition to expedite a prison sentence under federal law.Â
The case, Maxwell v. Thomas, focuses on William Maxwell, a man who sought release from prison and the ability to transfer to a halfway house or home confinement. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence in a Texas prison for racketeering.Â
Maxwell petitioned the high court based on the First Step Act of 2018, a law that made several significant reforms to prison sentences. The law allowed prisoners to earn credits toward an early release by enrolling in behavioral programs.Â
Maxwell alleged he was denied credits toward his release that would have reduced his overall sentence. The prison denied Maxwell's request, and he filed a habeas corpus petition to appeal the denial.Â
The lower court denied Maxwell's petition, saying he did not exhaust all administrative remedies to shorten his sentence. Lawyers for the government argued that Maxwell did not proceed with the petition properly.Â
"The magistrate judge reviewed the record and determined that petitioner had not exhausted any claim under the First Step Act, including for time credits," Solicitor General John Sauer wrote to the high court.Â
Maxwell's lawyers said the government's claim that he did not exhaust administrative remedies is unsubstantiated. The lawyers argued Maxwell interacted with prison staff during his appeal, which is considered an exhaustive means.Â
"His interactions with prison staff exhausted his administrative remedies as to his First Step Act claim," lawyers for Maxwell wrote.Â
The court's decision to hear this case follows several First Step Act challenges it has decided recently. Last week, the high court ruled against two prisoners who sought compassionate release under the First Step Act due to sentence stacking.Â
"When Congress declines to make a sentencing amendment retroactive, the fact that a preamendment sentence is longer than it would have been postamendment is not an 'extraordinary and compelling reaso[n]' that 'warrant[s]' a sentence reduction," Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in the court's majority opinion.Â
Justices on the high court will likely hear Maxwell's challenge to the time credits provision in the First Step Act in the fall.Â
Â
Originally published on thecentersquare.com, part of the BLOX Digital Content Exchange.
Please disable your ad blocker, whitelist our site, or purchase a subscription
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.