After a flurry of cases were decided Tuesday by the Arizona Supreme Court, the November ballot is set and voters will be deciding the fate of eight different ballot measures.
One result of the expedited appeals that the high court decided this week is that voters won’t have any direct say over how Arizona’s universal school voucher program will or won’t be regulated in the future.
Public school advocates saw their dreams of imposing strict new guardrails on the voucher system dashed when the Supreme Court ruled in a way that left them short of the minimum number of valid signatures to qualify for the ballot.
And in a separate case, the justices rejected a ploy by Republican lawmakers to amend the Arizona Constitution to effectively permanently bar future changes to the universal voucher system if there is any negative impact to military families who are in the legacy portion of the Empowerment Scholarship Account program.
Another proposed constitutional change that GOP legislators pushed as retribution against the Arizona Education Association, the state’s largest teachers union, for backing the voucher-reform initiative was thrown off the ballot last month after a judge concluded that it improperly also would have outlawed unions representing police officers and fire fighters.
Here are the eight ballot measures remaining:
Proposition 141 — Ban on vehicle-miles-traveled taxes
Amends the Arizona Constitution to bar all levels of government from imposing a tax or fee based on vehicle miles traveled, or monitoring those miles. The proposal seeks to preemptively eliminate possible replacements to the gas tax that currently pays for road construction and maintenance, but which is underfunded both because the tax has not increased in decades and the proliferation of electric vehicles and fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles.
Proposition 142 — Anti-DEI amendment
Amends the Arizona Constitution to add prohibitions targeting diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. It would bar public institutions from compelling endorsement of race-based preferences or DEI/intersectionality tenets, and from spending public money on offices that promote race-based preferential treatment. It includes carve-outs for coursework, research, student groups and instruction about events like slavery and the Holocaust.
Proposition 144 — “Fast Election Results Act”
Amends the Arizona Constitution to include
: only citizens may vote; foreign nationals may not contribute anything of value to influence an Arizona election; and every voter must show government-issued ID before casting a ballot “whether voting in person or by any other method.” The provisions limiting voting to citizens and requiring voter ID at polling places are already in state law; it is unclear how voters would show their ID if they vote by mail, as more than 70% of voters do.
Proposition 316 — Cap on local grocery taxes
Amends state law to cap municipal sales taxes on food for home consumption at 2% and requires voter approval for new or increased taxes; cities and towns already above 2% are frozen at their current rate rather than rolled back.
Proposition 317 — Drug cartels as terrorist organizations
Amends state law to declare drug cartels terrorist organizations and direct the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to act against them. The text includes a clause stating nothing in it supports an alien’s asylum claim, and ties its findings to
, which voters approved last year, and the “
.
Proposition 318 — Anti-trans “Protect Girls’ Sports Act”
from playing on the gender-appropriate K-12 or college sports team to require that teams be designated by biological sex (per original birth certificate) beginning in 2027. Additionally, the law would be expanded to bar schools from letting transgender students use the bathroom that matches their gender identity, something Republican lawmakers have failed to add to state law for more than a decade. The provisions would now
, not just Arizona schools.
Proposition 319 — Photo-enforcement voter approval
Amends state law to bar local governments from using photo enforcement systems to enforce traffic laws. For local governments and agencies already using photo enforcement systems as of Dec. 31, 2026, they must
. If voters approve the cameras, that authorization lasts for 10 years, after which voters must once again vote on their use.
Proposition 320 — 60% direct-instructional-spending mandate
Amends state law to require large school districts (those with at least 7,500-plus students) and all districts in Maricopa and Pima counties to spend at least 60% of operational dollars on direct classroom instruction, phased in over several years, with escalating cuts to a district’s Classroom Site Fund if it doesn’t comply. The
that, on average, 52.1 cents of every dollar currently ends up classified as instruction, the lowest in two decades of that report.
- 11:09 amThis story was updated to clarify that Prop. 319 also bans cities, towns and counties from implementing photo enforcement systems if they are not in place by Dec. 31, 2026.

(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.