I support term limits. I also agree with the Montana voter’s decision to require them.
When I first entered the Montana Legislature, I was surprised to learn of the practice of legislators immediately rotating back and forth between the House of Representative and Senate multiple times after serving an initial sixteen years in both chambers, with no break of service in the legislature.
It was explained to me that an interpretation by Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock in 2012 allowed the practice of an elected official returning to a legislative chamber after their term limits, despite still being in the legislature, as long as they have an eight-year break in service from a chamber.
Knowing that it was a Constitutional Initiative that put term limits in place, and knowing the language has not changed, I looked to understand what voters intended when they passed the Amendment in 1992.
The Constitutional language they approved states a candidate cannot appear on the ballot if, “at the end of the current term of that office”, that candidate will have served “8 or more years in any 16-year period” as a state senator, state representative, or in the covered statewide offices.
The words “current term” matters.
Montanans did not vote for perpetual rotating of chambers with no break in the legislature. They agreed a candidate shall not be placed on a ballot for that office after serving eight or more years in any 16-year period. That means once a legislator has done eight consecutive years in one chamber and immediately completed eight consecutive years in the other chamber, they must sit out a term in the legislature.
That is why I am pleased with Attorney General Austin Knudsen’s recent opinion putting the Constitution first and returning term limits to the will of the voters. Knudsen released a sixteen-page opinion restoring an original 1997 interpretation by Democratic Attorney General Joe Mazurek, which governed Montana elections for 15 years without the eight-year break clause before being changed in 2012. Knudsen’s opinion reaffirms what the Constitution says, that a break from the legislature is required.
This is not a partisan question. Mazurek was a Democrat. Knudsen is a Republican. What matters is that the interpretation follows the words Montanans placed in their Constitution.
If Montanans want different term limits, they have the power to change them. Until they do, elected officials must respect what the voters adopted.
The Constitution belongs to the people. Our job is to follow it.
Ken Bogner is a state senator representing District 18 and the Senate President Pro Tempore.
Originally published on bozemandailychronicle.com, part of the BLOX Digital Content Exchange.
Please disable your ad blocker, whitelist our site, or purchase a subscription
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.