The New Mexico Supreme Court on Wednesday shot down a lawsuit from three Republicans challenging the legality of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s first-in-the-nation universal childcare initiative.
Duke Rodriguez, who unsuccessfully ran for the Republican gubernatorial nomination; Zac Anaya, who unsuccessfully ran for the state House of Representatives; and Sen. Steve Lanier (R-Aztec) in Aprilfiled a lawsuitthat alleged Lujan Grisham violated the separation of powers in state government when sheannounced her universal childcare program last year.
An order filed Wednesday shows all five Supreme Court justices agreed to deny the appeal.
In a statement on social media, Lujan Grisham announced the decision and swiped at Rodriguez.
“This candidate lost in state District Court, lost in the Supreme Court and lost his bid to become the next governor of our state,” she wrote. “This means universal childcare in New Mexico is here to stay, and families have no more reason to fear that this life-changing program will be stripped away from them.”
Rodriguez told Source NM Thursday that he was disappointed with the order and said the justices should have issued a written opinion to explain their reasoning.
In public statements regarding the litigation, Rodriguez often invoked anold state Supreme Court casein which he was accused of implementing a state program in the late 1990s “without seeking legislative approval” while acting as then-Gov. Gary Johnson’s Human Services Department secretary.
On Thursday, he said he believed the court’s decision on universal childcare represented the death of “the Republican form of government in New Mexico,” adding that he believes it “completely erased the line between executive power and legislative authority.”
“The New Mexico Supreme Court handed this governor and every future governor power that properly belongs to the Legislature,” Rodriguez said. “Why have a Legislature at all? Why elect representatives? Why hold hearings? Why debate legislation? Why even require votes? Why should we pretend any further that there exists separate branches of government?”
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.