(Carolina Journal) – Duke Energy rate hikes from 2023 challenged by the state attorney general have been affirmed by the North Carolina Supreme Court.
The case was one of 20 announced Friday. Others included the censure of a Wake County judge and siding with Currituck County in an occupancy tax dispute.
The state Supreme Court split, 5-2, in a pair of cases upholding Duke Energy rate increases state regulators approved in 2023. The state attorney general and outside intervenors challenged the rate hikes.
The court’s Republican majority upheld the North Carolina Utilities Commission’s decisions. Justices Anita Earls and Allison Riggs, the court’s two Democrats, dissented.
“Because the Commission construed the law correctly and made sufficient findings of fact supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence in view of the entire record, we affirm,” wrote Justice Trey Allen for the majority.
“While our dissenting colleagues accuse us of ‘burying [our] heads, ostrich-like in the sand, as to the actual evidence below,’ the real difference between their position and ours is that we are unwilling to usurp the role of the Commission and reweigh the evidence,” Allen added. “This Court may not ‘disturb an order of the Commission merely because [we] would have given [the evidence] a different weight.’”
“If the Commission followed the law and based its decision on competent, material, and substantial evidence, we must uphold its determination, regardless of whether we would prefer a different outcome,” according to the majority opinion. “To do otherwise would be to appropriate power that does not belong to us and transform this institution into something other than an appellate court.”
Earls focused on the different rate increases approved for Duke’s eastern and western North Carolina customers.
“Duke Energy will charge consumers in the western part of the state more than consumers in the eastern part of the state for identical electrical services,” she wrote. “I dissent from the majority’s decision to approve this disparate treatment. In my view, the Commission’s decision in the Duke Energy Carolinas rate case is quite plainly unlawful and arbitrary.”
The General Assembly changed state law earlier in this decade to allow utilities to seek rate changes covering more than one year.
The post Top NC court tackles Currituck taxes, cannabis odor, Duke rates, more appeared first on Carolina Journal. The Carolina Journal is a publication of the John Locke Foundation.
Originally published on carolinajournal.com, part of the BLOX Digital Content Exchange.
Please disable your ad blocker, whitelist our site, or purchase a subscription
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.